If pre-publication review is anonymous, and it almost always is why isnt there anonymous post-publication peer review? If there is a benefit to anonymous review, then isn't it odd that the Faculty of 1000 and most journals commenting/letter to editor mechanisms require the submitter to provide a real name and appointment. Would post-publication review of articles suck less if it were anonymous?
There is definately a lot to find out about this issue.
ReplyDeleteI really like all of the points you've made.
My website ... Finanzberater in Wiesbaden
My webpage > gehaltsumwandlung altersvorsorge